nuestra puntuaciónsin valoraciones de usuarios - valore →
Análisis de Lantern (Brave New Software)
Una herramienta para eludir la censura que ahora adopta el ropaje de una organización sin ánimo de lucro: la entidad matriz de Lantern se convirtió en el proyecto Brave New Software Project, con estatus 501(c)(3), y el sitio ahora parece el de una VPN con una misión social ('sin ánimo de lucro', 'done ahora'), con una política de no registros actualizada a noviembre de 2025, un canario de órdenes judiciales en vigor (sin órdenes, sin solicitudes de seguridad nacional, sin órdenes de silencio 'hasta el 30 de junio de 2026') y una afirmación explícita de que 'técnicamente es incapaz de vincular su cuenta con su tráfico'. Sin embargo, las pruebas son más débiles que el marketing: no hay auditoría independiente con nombres revelados; reseñistas (TechRadar 2020, Comparitech) encontraron 'algún registro', carece de interruptor de emergencia (kill switch), no ofrece reembolsos, permite solo 3 dispositivos y no revela el número de servidores. Su punto fuerte coincide exactamente con su enfoque comercial: mantenerse accesible en regiones censuradas (Irán, Myanmar, Filipinas); sin embargo, usuarios en China la consideran inferior frente a WARP-MASQUE y Clash, en Rusia y Myanmar ha sido bloqueada expresamente por su nombre, y TechRadar desaconseja seguir el propio consejo de Lantern: si necesita anonimato, use Tor.
CanaryCódigo abierto3 señales de alertaHechos verified - operator pages (home/sobre-nosotros/FAQ/privacidad/pricing/transparency), 2 independent reviews, Tech Policy Press, Google News and two Reddit archives fetched live 2026-09-29; GreatFire watchdog re-check failed (503 + archive offline)
FAQ claims 'independently audited' but no audit report or auditor name is published anywhere on lantern.io
Email-based account system can itself be compelled (transparency report admits Lantern may confirm an account exists for a given email address)
Historical freemium/proxy-era reputation: pre-2025 reviews describe a proxy with undisclosed logging, ads and barely-existent support - the nonprofit relaunch is recent and its privacy promises are young
Análisis
Borrador de Qwen3, verificado por la redacción de serviciovpn · Versión del análisis 2 · Texto actualizado 2026-10-19 · Hechos a fecha de 2026-09-29 · cómo verificamos
Nota de honestidad: no hemos hecho tests propios de Lantern (Brave New Software) (fugas, velocidad, kill switch). Todo en esta página es metainvestigación basada en fuentes con enlaces fechados. En cuanto hagamos pruebas, los resultados aparecerán aquí y en el registro de cambios.
Overview
Lantern (Brave New Software) homepage - live capture 2026-09-29
Lantern is a freemium, nonprofit censorship-circumvention tool developed by Brave New Software Project, Inc., a U.S.-based 501(c)(3). It operates as a mission-driven service focused on unblocking access in censored regions like Iran and Myanmar. While it now markets itself as a no-logs VPN, its privacy claims rest solely on policy - not audits - and its history includes transparency issues and logging concerns.
Logging & privacy
Lantern claims a strict no-logs policy: no browsing history, traffic metadata, DNS queries, or connection logs are created or stored, making it technically unable to comply with government data requests. This claim is supported only by its November 2025 privacy policy and a transparency report updated through June 2026, which confirms no warrants, NSLs, or gag orders. However, there is no published third-party audit verifying these claims - despite the FAQ stating the software is “independently audited.” The U.S. jurisdiction carries surveillance risks, but Lantern’s warrant canary and unverified email signup add some transparency. Still, the lack of audit evidence means trust remains policy-based.
Pricing & the renewal trap
Lantern offers a 24-month plan at $3.63/month ($87.00 billed every two years) and a 12-month plan at $4.00/month ($48.00 billed annually). There is no price increase on renewal - so the renewal ratio is flat - and no refunds are offered. The free tier includes a daily data allowance (user reports suggest ~256 MB/day), with more generous or unlimited data in heavily censored regions. Payment is via Stripe, Apple, or Google, with no crypto support. The three-year cash total is not computed due to non-standard billing cycles, but you pay upfront with no escape hatch.
Features & performance
Lantern (Brave New Software) apps / download page - live capture 2026-09-29
Lantern supports auto-switching circumvention protocols, Smart Routing (proxying only blocked sites), and Private Server mode for self-hosting. It lacks a kill switch, multihop, P2P, and streaming support. The app is open-source and available on Windows, Mac, Linux, Android, and iOS, supporting up to three devices. Server count and country coverage are undisclosed. While it enables basic access in censored environments, it is not designed for high anonymity or media streaming, and performance claims are untested by us.
Ownership & track record
Brave New Software Project, Inc., a U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit, owns and operates Lantern. The organization’s mission centers on open internet access, and Pro subscriptions help fund free access in restricted regions. However, red flags persist: the claim of being “independently audited” lacks evidence, and historical reviews from TechRadar and Comparitech cite logging, poor support, and opacity. While the 2025 policy shift signals improvement, the absence of audit proof and live watchdog verification (GreatFire offline) means full trust is premature.
Censorship resistance
Lantern uses protocol switching, Smart Routing, and self-hosted Private Server mode to evade blocks, making it useful in censored environments like Iran and Myanmar. Users in the Philippines and UAE report success bypassing regional restrictions. However, Russia and Myanmar have explicitly banned it, and in China, it ranks behind Cloudflare WARP with MASQUE and Clash in stability and speed. It adapts to censorship but is not the strongest option for China-class filtering.
Verdict
Lantern is a viable tool for users in censored regions needing affordable or free access, especially where anonymity is secondary to availability. It’s not recommended for those requiring audited privacy or streaming capability. The nonprofit model is commendable, but its privacy claims remain unproven. There is no evidence Lantern pays review sites - its funding comes from grants and Pro subscriptions.
++ Qué se sostiene
Política de privacidad sólida sin registros (noviembre 2025) más un canario de garantías actualizado: sin órdenes judiciales, solicitudes de seguridad nacional ni órdenes judiciales, según el informe de transparencia enero-junio 2026
Técnicamente incapaz de vincular cuentas con tráfico o IPs con sesiones; el registro acepta correos electrónicos no verificados
Estructura sin fines de lucro (501(c)(3) Brave New Software Project, fundada en 2014): las suscripciones Pro financian el acceso gratuito en regiones censuradas
Código abierto (getlantern/lantern en GitHub, ~16k estrellas) con modo de servidor privado autohospedado opcional
Los precios en vivo son económicos: 3,63 USD/mes en el plan de 24 meses; la capa gratuita mantiene conectadas a las regiones censuradas
Comprobado en crisis de censura documentadas (Irán 2022, Hong Kong 2019; reportajes de Tech Policy Press desde Irán en tiempos de guerra)
-- A qué prestar atención
La afirmación de 'auditoría independiente' en las preguntas frecuentes no está respaldada por ningún auditor nombrado ni informe publicado
Los revisores encontraron 'algunos registros' y prácticas no divulgadas (TechRadar: preocupaciones de privacidad; Comparitech: 'no está claro si Lantern recopila grandes cantidades de datos')
Sin interruptor de emergencia (Comparitech), sin reembolsos (Comparitech; las preguntas frecuentes indican que las cuentas eliminadas pierden el tiempo Pro), solo 3 dispositivos simultáneos
No es una VPN completa: el enrutamiento inteligente solo enruta parte del tráfico; 'no es una herramienta completa de anonimato' (TechRadar); no desbloquea Netflix/iPlayer
El número de servidores, ubicaciones y detalles de protocolo no se revelan: transparencia mucho menor de lo que implican las afirmaciones sobre registros
Bloqueado por nombre en Rusia (Roskomnadzor) y Myanmar; los usuarios en China informan que Clash/WARP lo supera
El flujo de dinero - lo que ganan los portales de análisis con esta recomendación
Estado de afiliación aún sin verificar
Si nos uniéramos a este programa, cada enlace de aquí llevaría rel="nofollow sponsored" y pasaría por /go/. Hasta entonces, nuestros enlaces apuntan directamente al sitio del proveedor, sin ningún rastreo. La lógica de ordenación no puede leer físicamente los campos de afiliación - aquí la prueba.
On the website
Captured by our screenshot bot from the live site (or its public archive). A capture is evidence of what the page showed at capture time - not an endorsement.
Lantern (Brave New Software) homepage - live capture 2026-09-29Lantern (Brave New Software) apps / download page - live capture 2026-09-29
Antes de pagar: compruebe el precio de renovación, el plazo de reembolso y si un camino más barato o gratuito cubre su caso de uso - la lista honesta.
Estado de nuestras comprobaciones: 2026-09-29. Lantern (Brave New Software) alcanza 4.9/10 en nuestro análisis ponderado. Hemos registrado 3 señales de alerta (listadas arriba). Los reportes de usuarios, la propiedad y el historial de incidentes están documentados con fuentes fechadas en el metaanálisis de abajo.
What do I actually get with Lantern Pro?
Unlimited data, access on 3 devices, and support for the free tier in censored regions. It includes Smart Routing and Private Server mode but no kill switch, P2P, or streaming support.
What is the renewal price, and how much would I pay over three years?
The renewal price remains $3.63/month for the 24-month plan. The three-year cash total is not computed due to non-standard billing, but you pay $87 every two years with no refunds.
Is Lantern’s no-logs claim proven?
No. The claim is policy-only - backed by internal statements and a transparency report, but no independent audit has been published to verify it.
Can I use Lantern in China or other heavily censored countries?
It works in some censored regions like Iran and Myanmar, but in China, users report it’s less stable than WARP with MASQUE or Clash. It may be blocked over time.
Can I pay anonymously?
Yes. Lantern accepts unverified email signups and does not require KYC. Payments go through Stripe, Apple, or Google - none of which offer full anonymity.
What happens if Lantern shuts down?
If Lantern ceases operations, Pro subscriptions would stop working with no refunds. Self-hosted Private Server mode offers some continuity if you maintain your own instance.
What’s an honest free or cheap alternative?
For censorship bypass, consider Psiphon (freemium, widely used in restricted regions). For stronger privacy, use Tor - it’s free, audited, and designed for anonymity, though slower.
El metaanálisis: lo que internet dice de Lantern (Brave New Software)
No esperamos que nos crea. Este análisis es un metaanálisis: abajo verá lo que afirman otros portales de análisis - con sus conflictos de interés señalados -, lo que reportan los usuarios en Reddit y foros y quién opera realmente Lantern (Brave New Software). Cada afirmación enlaza su fuente para que pueda comprobarla usted mismo.
Lo que dicen otros testers (2)
Cada fuente lleva una etiqueta de conflicto de nuestra base de datos de portales de análisis. «Financiado por afiliación» significa: la web gana si usted compra lo que recomienda. Las voces críticas las incluimos deliberadamente.
Fetched 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200, published 2020-09-22): Verdict - 'blazing speeds and a free basic service... it can't be used for much else. It doesn't unblock Netflix or BBC iPlayer and there are some privacy concerns, so it's nowhere near a full VPN product.' Cons: 'Not a full VPN service, Some logging, Doesn't unblock Netflix, BBC iPlayer, Doesn't have much information available, Barely any customer support'. Also: 'Lantern is not a full anonymity tool, so the provider recommends you use Tor if you want to be anonymous online.'
Fetched 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200): critical verdict - 'There's just no way to recommend Lantern'; unclear whether Lantern 'collects massive amounts of data or staunchly respects your privacy' (review predates the 2025/11 privacy policy rewrite); no kill switch; protocols 'Proxy Servers'; encryption undisclosed; no refunds ('still pretty standard to offer a 30-day money-back guarantee, not so with Lantern'); 3 simultaneous devices 'way below the industry standard'; Pro at $2/mo on the two-year plan at time of review (live price 2026-09-29 is $3.63/mo).
Lo que dicen los usuarios (3)
Reddit, foros, HN - parafraseado y enlazado, nunca fuera de contexto. Anécdotas, no pruebas - pero las quejas de reembolso y los reportes de fugas son el mejor sistema de alerta temprana que tiene este mercado.
Fetched 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200): relevant HN threads: 'Lantern - Open Internet for Everyone' (Aug 2015, 134 points, 41 comments) and 'Lantern proxied sites lists - China' (2013, 21 points). Recent HN signal is weak - honest note: the 2023+ 'Lantern' hits on HN are mostly a Postgres vector DB and Magic Lantern, not the VPN.
Fetched 2026-09-29 (HTTP 200): 25 posts from r/dumbclub - Lantern's own-support subreddit (community tier: Lantern accounts are provisioned through 'dumbclub' access codes); 11 comments mentioning Psiphon for cross-tool context.
¿Quién está detrás de Lantern (Brave New Software)?
La propiedad de los VPN a menudo se enreda deliberadamente con empresas pantalla. Esto es lo que pudimos verificar - con fuentes. Grado de confianza: confirmed (comprobado 2026-10-23).
Propietario
Brave New Software Project, Inc. (501(c)(3))
Detalle
Lantern is the project of the 501(c)(3) Brave New Software P… másLantern is the project of the 501(c)(3) Brave New Software Project, Inc. (dossier provider_type)
Informe de hechos con IA - todo lo que sabemos, condensado
Generado por Qwen3 el 2026-10-19 a partir de nuestra base de datos de hechos y las fuentes enlazadas. Resume - no añade hechos. Contraste todo lo importante con las fuentes enlazadas.
Bottom line: Lantern is a censorship-circumvention tool rebranded as a nonprofit VPN, effective in some restricted regions (Iran, Myanmar) but not a full privacy solution. It lacks key features like a kill switch, offers no refunds, and has unverified anonymity claims. Use it for basic unblocking, not anonymity.
The logging truth: Lantern claims a strict no-logs policy - no browsing history, metadata, DNS, or connection logs - and says it’s technically unable to link accounts to traffic. Evidence is policy-only (2025 privacy policy, 2026 transparency report), with no named third-party audit despite claiming to be “independently audited.” Jurisdiction is the United States, a Five Eyes member.
Pricing reality: Pricing starts at $3.63/month billed every two years ($87 total), with no monthly option and zero refunds. The free tier offers about 256 MB/day, more in censored regions. Minimum spend is $48, and canceling forfeits remaining Pro time.
What reviewers say vs what users say: Affiliate reviewers (TechRadar 2020, Comparitech) dismiss Lantern as “nowhere near a full VPN” with past logging concerns and poor support. In contrast, users in censored regions (Reddit r/InternetPH, r/FiloCommunityinUAE) report it works for bypassing blocks, though China users rank it behind WARP and Clash. Conflict: reviewers highlight structural flaws; users in crisis zones value availability over anonymity.
Who runs it: Brave New Software Project, Inc., a US 501(c)(3) nonprofit based in California. The organization’s mission is open internet access, funding free usage via Pro subscriptions and grants. Ownership is transparent but lacks technical oversight proof.
Fuentes & cómo se hizo este análisis
Cada fuente externa usada en esta página, con su fecha de consulta y su clase de prueba [A]-[D] (A = fuente primaria/del operador, B = prensa seria/investigación, C = comunidad, D = mediciones propias). Metodología: cómo verificamos. Las fuentes desaparecen o cambian - si un enlace está muerto, avísenos por la página de contacto.
Evidence classes on this page:[A] A: 8[B] B: 5[C] C: 3[D] D: 0(D stays empty until our own test phase)
A DNS-layer filtering service that has grown up in public: born January-April 2021 out of the Windscribe team (same three founders, spun out precisely because…
Código abierto
Inicial: 3,00 US$ /mo
Canada - CONTROLD, Inc., Toronto, Ontario; operator about-us page states 'Founded in 2021 - Toronto, Canada' and site footer reads '2026 CONTROLD, Inc.'; free-dns FAQ calls it 'based in Toronto, Canada... the sister company of Windscribe'herramienta de privacidad hace 42 h
Hysteria 2 is not a VPN provider - it is free, MIT-licensed proxy software you deploy on your own server, and this dossier treats it that way: there is no…
Código abierto
Inicial: 5,00 US$ /mo
none - Hysteria is not a company; it is MIT-licensed open-source software (Go) developed by a volunteer community around lead developer 'Toby' (GitHub: tobyxdd), with the repo on GitHub and docs at hysteria.networkherramienta de privacidad hace 42 h
The mainstream default of DNS-level filtering, with a genuinely honest scoping the operator itself states plainly: AdGuard DNS sits at the resolver - it…
Código abierto
Inicial: 2,49 US$ /mo
Cyprus - operator is Adguard Software Limited, registered in Limassol, Cyprus (privacy policy and about page, both fetched live); the parent AdGuard company was founded in Moscow, Russia in 2009 and later moved its headquarters to Cyprus (Wikipedia)herramienta de privacidad hace 42 h
Aún no hay comentarios - sea el primero. Publicar pasa por una breve prueba de trabajo en su navegador (antispam), sin necesidad de cuenta.